This is a simple question with a simple answer, but there is a lot of misinformation surrounding atheism. As such, I think it is important to go into quite a bit of detail about what an atheist actually is. This post will be in three parts: the first part will discuss what atheism is, the second part will discuss the idea of different types of atheism, and the third part will discuss how someone can be an atheist.
Let’s begin with what atheism is. To put it simply, atheism is the belief that gods don’t exist. As I stated before, this is a simple answer, but it is surrounded by misinformation and disagreement.
The definition of an atheist is “a person who believes gods do not exist.” This definition can be found in dictionaries and online (although some definitions are Christian-centric). Both definitions make it clear that atheism is characterized by a lack of belief in gods, or in their existence. Many people assert that the absence of belief comes about by deliberate choice. That atheists believe that they chose to become atheists. Many Christians often use this claim to assert that atheists are choosing to spend eternity in hell. However, the possibility of an inability to believe in gods is often ignored outside of atheist circles. Many theists believe that, since they cannot imagine not believing in their god(s), atheism must be a deliberate choice made by the atheist. It seems odd to me that a theist would be so willing to say that they could never choose to be an atheist, but then are quick to tell an atheist that they must have chosen. Personally, I do not believe I chose to be an atheist. In fact, I tried very hard to prevent myself from becoming an atheist. Atheism is also accused of being born out of ignorance of religious teachings. For some atheists this is true. Some people are not raised religious, and they simply do not believe in gods because they were not taught to. These people might not have any knowledge of religious teachings. But the vast majority of atheists were raised within a religion, and they tend to have as much knowledge, if not more, about that religion as do their peers and many atheists try out numerous religions before concluding that they are atheists. As such, it cannot be assumed that an atheist is ignorant of Christianity.
Some people believe that atheists are either strong or weak atheists. They believe that a weak atheist merely has an absence of belief in gods. Meanwhile, they believe that strong atheists actively believe that particular gods, or all gods, do not exist. I can understand the wish to believe this: it makes it possible to discuss “those good atheists” as opposed to “those bad atheists.” However, I do not believe this view holds any relevance. In my experience, an atheist, regardless of whether they claim to believe that gods don’t exist or to merely lack a belief in gods, is an atheist to the same degree as every other atheist. We have different reasons to word our disbelief differently, but it is not any more or less of a disbelief. The differences between atheists do not lie in this realm, they lie in the realm of what we add to our atheism.
We’ve covered the fact that atheists don’t believe that gods exist, but why don’t atheists believe in gods if we know that there is no proof that they don’t exist? Simply put it is because there is no reason to. There may not be evidence that gods don’t exist, but that doesn’t matter because there is also no evidence that those same gods actually do exist. We aren’t placing a bet, we are stating a belief. Without evidence to hold a belief, why would we hold it? This seems to be a complicated idea for many theists to understand: most atheists don’t think that there is proof that gods don’t exist. Rather, we think that it is more likely that they don’t exist, because, if they existed, there should be ample evidence of their existence that would convince everyone. After all, in the majority of mythology (including the Bible), gods made their existence fairly obvious by actually interacting with humans.
According to a recent Pew Religious Landscape survey, 14% of people who call themselves atheists say they believe in God or a universal spirit, including 5% who say that they are certain about the existence of God or a universal spirit. This leads one to wonder: are they atheists? After all, claiming to believe in and god goes against the definition of what it means to be an atheist. In my mind, I would say that they aren’t atheists. While I believe that it is not for me to tell a person what labels they can or cannot have, I do believe that allowing anybody to label themselves however they want destroys any meaning that the label would hold. I do not think that somebody who doesn’t believe in the existence of Jesus should be considered a Christian, because Jesus as the son of God is a very important part of being a Christian. I wouldn’t tell someone that they aren’t a Christian because they don’t fit my definition of a Christian, but I would tell someone that they aren’t a Christian if they don’t believe in God or Christ. Likewise, I won’t tell someone that they aren’t an atheist because they aren’t my kind of atheist (though it is tempting to do so at times), but I will tell somebody who believes in a god that they aren’t an atheist, because atheist is the belief that gods don’t exist. There are also many people who fit the dictionary definition of an atheist, but they don’t call themselves atheists. This makes more sense to me than someone who believes in gods calling themself an atheist. This is also why reason why I don’t want to force labels on people. Atheism is a widely misunderstood, and mistrusted group. There are many misconceptions about atheism, and it is often scary to be an atheist. People have been fired for being atheists, some people have even been murdered. And even those of us who face no risks as far as our lives and livelihoods go face a certain level of discrimination. I have lost track of the number of times I have been told that I can’t be moral, and it is both accepted and expected that people will be openly hostile towards me for no better reason than because I’m an atheist. Who would want to apply a label to themself when they risk discrimination for it? Especially when calling oneself an agnostic or a non-theist doesn’t cause the same reaction. And even many non-religious people view atheists as the assholes while agnostics and non-theists are viewed as kinder and more PC (it’s funny how people like the idea of people being PC when it makes them comfortable, but they hate it as soon as it tells them they can’t be assholes).
It is important to acknowledging that “atheism” may mean different things to different people, and that their personal definition may not fit the conventional understanding of the word, but it is also important to understand that definitions exist for a reason and watering them down too much only causes them to become useless. It has been argued that someone may take an active dislike to institutionalized religion, but they may still believe in some sort of a deity, so they may adopt the title “atheist” as a kind of protest against the institution that they disagree with. I understand this disagreement, however, there are better labels to use. For instance, many people prefer “spiritual” if they dislike the institution of religion. Being spiritual allows one to maintain their belief in a god, but being an atheist doesn’t. It has also been argued that some of the survey respondents may consider themselves atheists but use the term “God” to refer to abstract laws of nature or the principles of the universe. This seems odd to me, but less problematic. Rather that watering a term down, one is simply adding another term to a definition. This doesn’t water the term down, but it does make communication more difficult. The article that discussed the survey suggested the concepts of narrow atheism and wide atheism as ways to understand how someone could be both an atheist and a theist. It was suggested that someone might be a narrow atheist if they don’t believe in a god in the sense that it is commonly accepted by Western society, but they might still believe in some sort of a spiritual force. A wide atheist simply rejects any concept of the supernatural. Personally, I don’t like these concepts. Atheism and theism are already in a binary relationship. You are either a theist and believe in gods, or an atheist and don’t believe in gods. Further more, this is not a problematic dichotomy in that it does not dismiss anyone’s identity. Adding the definitions of wide and narrow atheism doesn’t add anything, but it does water down the concept of atheism. It also doesn’t help atheism gain acceptance within mainstream society.
I have already discussed a couple of categories of atheism. However, those were not the categories I meant when I said that I would discuss different types of atheism. Rather, I was concerned with the categories that indicate what people add to their atheism. These types are types that I ave not considered in the past, but thought were worth sharing.
The first category is the Intellectual Atheist. This is said to be the most common type of non-believer according to The Pew Research Center with nearly 38 percent of atheists being Intellectual Atheists. It is said that these atheists enjoys intellectual discourse. While they are often very certain about their beliefs, they don’t tend to have a holier-than-thou attitude. Unfortunately, Intellectual Atheists are often judged as being dogmatic because they tend to join skeptic groups or otherwise find avenues to discuss non-belief with others. They like to debate religion, but they don’t chase down believers to argue with them. Since this category describes me perfectly, I may be of this type. However, as you will see, I also fit into other types.
The second type of non-theist is the Activist. These atheists are also commonly accused of being dogmatic, but, like the intellectual atheist, they are set in their beliefs but intellectually flexible and don’t try to attack the religious. Activists are motivated by humanist values and wish to make the world a better place. They often deal with other issues on top of their atheism, for example, feminism, LGBT rights, or pseudo-science. They also tend to advocates for a more egalitarian atheist community. As a result, they often attract a lot of abuse from some atheists who disapprove of linking secularism with larger social justice issues. They make up 23 percent of non-believers. I also fit perfectly into this category, and I rejoice at the thought of 23 percent of atheists being Activists.
The third type of non-theist is the Seeker-Agnostic. They only makes up 7.6 percent of non-believers, and are unlikely to be very critical of religion, as compared to the other categories. They prioritize not-knowingness, which seems silly and pointless to me. They apparently don’t really believe in anything, and they seem to be uncomfortable committing to non-belief completely. They tend to get accused of intellectual cowardice by atheists. While I don’t believe they are cowards, I do believe that they aren’t willing to admit to a belief that they in fact hold (that being whether they think a god exists or not). But, as I said earlier, I understand this willingness to not label oneself.
The next type is the Anti-Theist. Anti-theists tend to be conflated with all atheists by theists, but they only make up around 15 percent of non-believers. Like Intellectual Atheists, they enjoy debating religion, but they tend to be much more aggressive about it and are willing to actively seek out religious people to debate with them. While atheists generally limit themselves to supporting a more secular society, anti-theists tend to view ending religion as their real goal. Personally, while I don’t see ending religion as the main goal, I also don’t see a problem with this goal. However, I do have a problem with how aggressive anti-theists are towards the religious. I don’t find such aggression helpful. However, type of atheism does have a time and a place.
The next type is the Non-Theist. They simply don’t believe in any gods. They don’t think about those who do very often, or rather, they don’t think about belief in gods very often. They only make up 4.4 percent of non-believers, probably due to the fact that religion makes up such a vital part of society. I know a number of people in this category. While I don’t think that religion is something to take so lightly, I do understand the wish to see religion this way. I also hold no ill-will to those in this category.
The last type is the Ritual Atheist. They make up 12.5 percent of atheists. They don’t really believe in the supernatural, but they do believe in community, and they enjoy this aspects of religious tradition. Ritual Atheists tend to align themselves with a religious tradition even while professing no belief, which seems to bother both religious and non-religious people. While I don’t do anything like Sunday Assembly, I do like a lot of the tradition surrounding Christianity. I have actively tried to move away from a lot of it in order to create my own traditions, but I think community is important, and I’ve always enjoyed traditions. As such, I could probably easily fit into this group.
While I understand breaking atheism (or non-belief) up in this way, these categories are not perfect. As you can see, it makes it easier to understand the motivations of different atheists, and it separates atheists in a different way that doesn’t try to suggest different ways of disbelieving. But it is problematic in that it suggests that you can only be in one category. As you can see, I fit nicely into three of those categories, so it is too simplistic to say that you can only be in one category.
So how can someone be an atheist? Or rather, what makes someone an atheist? Why would someone want to be an atheist? And does wanting to be an atheist matter? Here is some advise that can teach what it takes to be an atheist, but it cannot make someone an atheist.
The only required step is to not believe in any gods. If you assume that there are any other requirements to being an atheist, then you do not understand what an atheist is. Unfortunately, a lot of people do believe that being an atheist has other requirements.
We all come to our disbelief in different ways. For some people, not believing in any gods can be difficult. They may be afraid to give up their belief, or they may see it as impossible to disbelieve. Those in the latter category don’t generally become atheists, but, if they do, it tends to take them years to lose their belief. Other people come to atheism a lot easier. For them, it is natural. Many of them realize that they never truly believed, or that they stopped believing at a young age. This is the category that I find myself in. However, what’s more difficult is determining what to do after you realize you don’t believe in any gods any more. You don’t have to do anything other than not believe to be an atheist, but coming to the conclusion that there are no gods can challenge a lot of your deeply held assumptions and lead you to question, and even change, a number of your other beliefs. It happened to me. My advise would be to do research and determine why you believe something and whether that justification still makes sense to you. If it doesn’t, don’t feel ashamed about changing beliefs. The most difficult thing about becoming an atheist is how people will treat you. If you come from a religious tradition, then you likely know more people who are also part of that tradition than are outside of it. As such, people will start treating you differently if you tell them that you don’t believe in their gods any more. This could range anywhere from people questioning why you would stop believing and wondering if it’s a phase to being actively hostile towards you. You may lose friends and family. However, as daunting as it can be, you can find a community of like-minded individuals.
November 26th, 2019 at 1:51 pm
The image of how to tell someone is atheist is not true I’m atheist and I don’t look anything like that.is like I’m able to tell this guy is racist because he’s white and is weird
May 24th, 2015 at 6:54 pm
Apologies up front for this lengthy post. If you look at my blog you’ll see its a bad habit of mine 🙂
I’m a Christian and that’s my choice based on what I believe to be true after 63 years of life experience.
You’re an atheist, and if I’m reading this post correctly, you say that’s simply because you have no reason to believe in the existence of any gods. Its not your choice, its just your present state of mind.
Clearly, your interpretation of the evidence encountered so far in your life (I understand you’re just out of school), is that you haven’t seen or heard anything that might cause you to believe in a god. Fair enough. That’s a common stance among university students who are generally more focused on their newly-realized intellect, sense of reason, and feelings of empowerment. (Gonna change the world!).
But atheism isn’t a new concept that we all need to be enlightened about. Its been around since the dawn of time and will always be with us as a system of belief (or non-belief). Most of us have been there. I was a card-carrying atheist for years! The devout of many faiths fondly recall their college days when they dabbled in socialism, atheism, eastern mysticism, radical feminism and a host of ideologies generally regarded as left-of-liberal.
Indeed, university campuses were fertile ground for (atheist) communism back in the day. I recall the 60’s when the whole college-born free-love hippie thing was happening. Fun times indeed – and no religion too.
So that’s OK. I respect your entitlement to youthful exploration of philosophy and the meaning of life in your college years and your conclusion, based on the information you have, that their are no gods.
I confess to some cynicism though. I put my three kids through university. They went in with open minds and came out as devout atheist activists who saw the gender boogie-man everywhere they looked. I still have my copy of Dawkins’ “The God Delusion” that my son sent me.
Fortunately, they’re over that now (life, jobs, kids, reality) and, for what its worth, two of them are Christian.
What I find troubling is that so many newly-hatched graduates devote (waste?) considerable energy telling the world what it is they don’t believe in! Don’t you have other interests? Do you think the world cares? Why not write about why you don’t like broccoli? I’d be just as relevant. Especially to those of us who don’t know you.
Perhaps I’m missing the point. Maybe there’s something in it for you. Do blogs like this get lots of traffic? (Let me know. I don’t believe in fairies so I might start a similar blog soon).
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 24th, 2015 at 7:45 pm
No need to apologize for a long comment, if you look at our blog we make them all the time as well.
Well since I’m assuming your final paragraph wasn’t directed at us since it doesn’t reflect what we do on this blog, but at students more generally. Lets be clear about what I think is important in this issue. The question for me is not what you believe, or what you don’t believe. I care about WHY you believe it. I’m concerned with what I can show to be true, and what I can’t. From there I concern myself with a great deal of things.
Many student, many people, religious or not, are not critical about the why they think things, but latch on to ideologies without concerning themselves deeper epistemological concerns. This is a problem, but not one you’ve really touched on. The fact is in general people don’t have good reasons for what they do or what they believe, they don’t consider things deeply. This blog is about considering thing deeply, although it’s not always easy to do so and more often then not people see what they expect too see then what is actually there.
Also I don’t just think that I haven’t seen evidence for God, but that god is an ill defined concept which makes finding evidence for such a thing next to impossible. Even if you where to show me a suspension is the physical laws we think govern our universe that wouldn’t prove that a god did it, we would need much more. The biggest issue that the epistemological burden f an unseen god is massive, and people just don’t have the first idea how or even that they should consider those epistemological matters when making decisions and forming opinions.
Also it should be noted that people don’t normally suggest that people who don’t like broccoli are immoral baby eaters. Or for a proper comparison. People who don’t beilive in fairies are immoral because belief in fairies is the only source of objective morality.
People don’t trust Atheist because people think that a belief in a magic man in the sky somehow makes you more moral then someone who does not. I think that’s plenty of reason to talk about atheism.
Also if it this was not clear, our blog is about a great deal more then just atheism. While we concern ourselves with our belief that gods do not exist. We do that because we are concerned with truth, and ethics. We are also concerned with the social and cultural issues surrounding gender which you very clearly chosen to disregard. And we are intersectional feminists not radical feminists, but with that as you will.
In closing what I wonder is are you concerned with people who haven’t come to the same conclusions as you, or are you concerned with the justification they have for believing what they do.
May 21st, 2015 at 11:48 am
I agree with you that believing in pantheism should not be considered atheism. I also believe in a universal spirit due to my own perceptions, and was not aware how common that perspective was statistically.
March 17th, 2015 at 6:22 am
Great stuff here. Thanks for visiting my page and following me. All the best. jpb
March 3rd, 2015 at 9:19 pm
February 23rd, 2015 at 1:44 pm
As the world has labeled me a Christian because of my beliefs, I’m sure you’ll understand why I do not agree with atheism. However, just because I do not share your beliefs does not mean that I don’t respect them. I admire your strength to resist the negative feedback of others and to draw your own conclusions without being easily persuaded by the world. I think our life experiences will shape our passions, but if we allow others to influence our beliefs, than finding ourselves will mean nothing. I enjoy reading your posts and although my beliefs will not change, because like you I have also chosen my own path, I am always excited to read the thoughts of someone who thinks differently than I do. I look forward to reading more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 21st, 2015 at 9:16 am
This is the first time I’ve ever heard someone talking about atheism not being “a choice.” I’m a new atheist (formerly a devout Catholic) and certainly not an atheist by choice…my faith evaporated a few months ago. This has left me in an awkward position, as it seems some other atheists think I’m not real or genuine enough since I didn’t “choose” non-belief. Of course religious people think I’m an instrument of satan either way, but I no longer care about their arguments..
Perhaps it’s because I’m such a new atheist that I define myself by what I don’t believe…I’ve found your writings about what they do believe to be very interesting and informative. I’ve enjoyed reading your blog and will catch up with more of it when I have a chance.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 21st, 2015 at 1:57 pm
Welcome and good luck! There is a period of learning so don’t worry if you first impression are a bit skewed, avoid you tube comments, and as we’ll get into more with or Atheism 101 posts that atheists don’t always belief the same things, and the further you move from he subject of divinity and religion the less cohesion you will find.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 19th, 2015 at 3:13 pm
Considering the fact that the word “atheist” itself is (for some reason) viewed more negatively in our culture than what it refers to, I really don’t understand people who call themselves atheists while believing in a God.
I know there are non-theists who use the word “God” to refer to abstract things that most people wouldn’t classify as a deity, but as far as I know most of them don’t label themselves as atheists.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 19th, 2015 at 7:31 am
Reblogged this on Uniqely Mustered and commented:
Christians and Others is how I wish to classify the term: Theist and Atheists. Nevertheless, it’s for your perception to what you hold as Theists and what you see as Atheist. The article specifies a safe guideline on how to know both sides and develop on what to increase or decrease.
To me, I understand this perfectly to mean: is about the individual of which it’s so cumbersome to express and distinctly emphasize. I’m a Christian no doubt(and a staunch Catholic) but this article has helped me navigate how to break either folds(Christians vs Others) into an understandably simpler term as it further split itself to befit the person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 19th, 2015 at 12:32 am
[…] Source: Atheism 101: What is Atheism? […]
February 19th, 2015 at 12:06 am
cool nice one 🙂
February 18th, 2015 at 7:17 pm
February 18th, 2015 at 6:55 pm
I haven’t even read through the WHOLE article but I just wanted to say THANK YOU for this clarification.
February 18th, 2015 at 6:47 pm
Very interesting entry. I don’t consider myself an atheist, though I have yet to have any of my Christian friends come up with a better argument towards the existence of God other than “you have to have faith”. I normally check the ‘humanist’ box when asked my religion, which has brought me no end of grief in my life, which is suprising as I couldn’t care less if you believe in Jesus, Allah, Buddah, Yoda or any other deiety. I think people should be able to believe in whatever magical fairies they wish, however, I stand firm behind my belief that if we all just stepped back and served humanity in our lives, instead of some doctorine laid down by a religious leader, our world would be a more peacful place to live.
I shall stop rambling now, and just reiterate how enlightening (for lack of a better word) your entry was.
LikeLiked by 1 person